<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: why automakers not making cars for us to put 100% ethanol fuel in the tank?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/</link>
	<description>Renewable energy transformations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emiller1998</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>emiller1998</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Lots of reasons.
- Ethanol takes more energy to make than you get out of it.  
- It takes huge amounts of water to make.
- It costs more than gas to make (before the govt subsidies).
- Your mileage will be about 1/3 lower than with gas.
- Corn doesn&#039;t make good ethanol.  Sugar does but the US climate isn&#039;t right to grow much of it.  We would just be importing fuel from somewhere other than the middle east like Brazil where they will cut down rain forest to make more farms.
- Corn should be used for food.  Animals and people need to eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of reasons.<br />
- Ethanol takes more energy to make than you get out of it.<br />
- It takes huge amounts of water to make.<br />
- It costs more than gas to make (before the govt subsidies).<br />
- Your mileage will be about 1/3 lower than with gas.<br />
- Corn doesn&#8217;t make good ethanol.  Sugar does but the US climate isn&#8217;t right to grow much of it.  We would just be importing fuel from somewhere other than the middle east like Brazil where they will cut down rain forest to make more farms.<br />
- Corn should be used for food.  Animals and people need to eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What kinda question is that?</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>What kinda question is that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Read this...
If it works as promised, it will be the future of ethanol.
 Ethanol needs to be mixed with something to keep people from drinking it as cheap booze.
My flex fuel truck runs better on ethanol than it does on gas &amp; starts just fine on those sub-zero midwest winter mornings with 15% less fuel mileage than gas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this&#8230;<br />
If it works as promised, it will be the future of ethanol.<br />
 Ethanol needs to be mixed with something to keep people from drinking it as cheap booze.<br />
My flex fuel truck runs better on ethanol than it does on gas &#038; starts just fine on those sub-zero midwest winter mornings with 15% less fuel mileage than gas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john m</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>john m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Corn will make 30gals of Ethanol per acre in one year.

100% Ethanol will drop you mpg by 30 to 40%

You will burn about 600 gals a year of Ethanol so you would need 20 acres per car just to make the fuel.

This is not good.

 United States consists of about 2.26 billion acres of land 

There are 143,000,000 cars in the USA.

So you would need 2.86 billion acres to make the Ethanol of them.

As you can see it will never work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corn will make 30gals of Ethanol per acre in one year.</p>
<p>100% Ethanol will drop you mpg by 30 to 40%</p>
<p>You will burn about 600 gals a year of Ethanol so you would need 20 acres per car just to make the fuel.</p>
<p>This is not good.</p>
<p> United States consists of about 2.26 billion acres of land </p>
<p>There are 143,000,000 cars in the USA.</p>
<p>So you would need 2.86 billion acres to make the Ethanol of them.</p>
<p>As you can see it will never work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestonnet_00</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>bestonnet_00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Considering that ethanol actually results in more CO2 emissions than oil out the ground, competes with food production and damages engines that aren&#039;t designed to run on it there are some damn good reasons not to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that ethanol actually results in more CO2 emissions than oil out the ground, competes with food production and damages engines that aren&#8217;t designed to run on it there are some damn good reasons not to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shreeya G</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Shreeya G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>using 100% ethanol is somewhat dangerous as well as it can catch fire and if our budding scientists can come over it ,the problem still remains unsolved as production of ethanol also requires energy and is not available naturally hence it would be foolish to use ethanol.
Another thing is the average given is lower incase of ethanol and hence it could act as an additional supply but fully depending on it wud not be the right option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>using 100% ethanol is somewhat dangerous as well as it can catch fire and if our budding scientists can come over it ,the problem still remains unsolved as production of ethanol also requires energy and is not available naturally hence it would be foolish to use ethanol.<br />
Another thing is the average given is lower incase of ethanol and hence it could act as an additional supply but fully depending on it wud not be the right option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzfan</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>jazzfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-823</guid>
		<description>We&#039;d need to redesign engines first, since even flex-fuel cars won&#039;t run on 100% ethanol and you have cold-start problems even at moderate temperatures. Both problems can be overcome and ethanol can be made from far better sources than corn. Corn yields 331 gallons of fuel per acre, a strain of algae now being tested will yield 6,000 gallons of fuel and the algae emits gaseous ethanol. Which means little to no processing, just condense it and put it in a fuel tank.

It&#039;s important to use close to 100% ethanol since otherwise it produces pollution that may be even more harmful than a gasoline engine produces.   ethanol emissions

Electric cars are probably the future but the GE EV1 in the movie &quot;Who Killed the Electric Car&quot; never used current battery technologies, was horrendously expensive and just not practical. But it was a good test bed for future designs and some of those are already on the market, with many more to be available in the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;d need to redesign engines first, since even flex-fuel cars won&#8217;t run on 100% ethanol and you have cold-start problems even at moderate temperatures. Both problems can be overcome and ethanol can be made from far better sources than corn. Corn yields 331 gallons of fuel per acre, a strain of algae now being tested will yield 6,000 gallons of fuel and the algae emits gaseous ethanol. Which means little to no processing, just condense it and put it in a fuel tank.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to use close to 100% ethanol since otherwise it produces pollution that may be even more harmful than a gasoline engine produces.   ethanol emissions</p>
<p>Electric cars are probably the future but the GE EV1 in the movie &#8220;Who Killed the Electric Car&#8221; never used current battery technologies, was horrendously expensive and just not practical. But it was a good test bed for future designs and some of those are already on the market, with many more to be available in the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unplugged-electric cars exist!!!</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>unplugged-electric cars exist!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-822</guid>
		<description>cause you need the crop to produce ethanol fuel. and then food prices would go up. but they recently considered a plant in India that grows and spreads like a weed. and it also makes fruit which can be used to make ethanol fuel. and it require&#039;s no watering so it can grow anywhere. but still, its not going to make enough for the whole world...atleast not in the near future.

i think electric cars would be the solution to global warming and high fuel prices. electric car technology has been around since the 70&#039;s. and in the 90&#039;s, automakers started making practical electric vehicles. but then they were all taken away and demolished because the oil companies didn&#039;t want them cause they&#039;d interfere with their profits. this is just what happened in a nut shell. go on youtube or google video&#039;s and you can watch the movie &quot;who killed the electric car&quot; for free. the facts in it will surprise you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cause you need the crop to produce ethanol fuel. and then food prices would go up. but they recently considered a plant in India that grows and spreads like a weed. and it also makes fruit which can be used to make ethanol fuel. and it require&#8217;s no watering so it can grow anywhere. but still, its not going to make enough for the whole world&#8230;atleast not in the near future.</p>
<p>i think electric cars would be the solution to global warming and high fuel prices. electric car technology has been around since the 70&#8242;s. and in the 90&#8242;s, automakers started making practical electric vehicles. but then they were all taken away and demolished because the oil companies didn&#8217;t want them cause they&#8217;d interfere with their profits. this is just what happened in a nut shell. go on youtube or google video&#8217;s and you can watch the movie &#8220;who killed the electric car&#8221; for free. the facts in it will surprise you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparhawk7322</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>sparhawk7322</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Because ethanol based fuels would require that most all of the tanks and pipelines that handle fuel be completely redesigned.  Ethanol has a much higher water content that would cause the current hardware to rust out much quicker.  

Also ethanol is not a very efficient source of fuel.  I would rather see more being done with hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because ethanol based fuels would require that most all of the tanks and pipelines that handle fuel be completely redesigned.  Ethanol has a much higher water content that would cause the current hardware to rust out much quicker.  </p>
<p>Also ethanol is not a very efficient source of fuel.  I would rather see more being done with hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hex92</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Hex92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>IIRC we would have to plant 75% of the farmland in the US with corn to provide enough ethanol to meet our needs to replace gasoline. 

So what are you planning on eating after we do that? Better plant a garden and start raising your own animals for meat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC we would have to plant 75% of the farmland in the US with corn to provide enough ethanol to meet our needs to replace gasoline. </p>
<p>So what are you planning on eating after we do that? Better plant a garden and start raising your own animals for meat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel W</title>
		<link>http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-819</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecotransfers.com/blog/2008/04/why-automakers-not-making-cars-for-us-to-put-100-ethanol-fuel-in-the-tank/#comment-819</guid>
		<description>Flexi-fuel cars can run on gasoline 100% , ethanol 100% or any mixture of the two.
They are intelligent cars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexi-fuel cars can run on gasoline 100% , ethanol 100% or any mixture of the two.<br />
They are intelligent cars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/6 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 276/293 objects using disk: basic

Served from: ecotransfers.com @ 2012-02-11 09:58:39 -->
